Pirate a Gucci: the (speculative) future of 3D Printing?

3D Printers, also known as Fabricators or “Fabbers.” Have you heard of them? There are a variety of techniques that slowly build pre-programmed objects in a variety of materials, varying in scale from hobbyists spraying thin resin films into fun shapes to airplane manufacturers preparing to bypass manufacturing limitations by “printing” airplane wings in heretofore impossible shapes. Some consider it could become a revolution on scale with the printing press, steam engine, or transistor.

Quote:

The leading systems range in price from just under $25,000 to about $60,000 per unit. An annual maintenance agreement costs about $3,000 to $9,000 and vary by machine type. Materials range from about $1.50 to $2 per cubic inch of part (including infiltrant) for the materials from Z Corp. to $250 per kilogram for the ABS material for the Dimension machine.

 

On the lower cost end hobbyists are already able to build and run these machines (for about the cost/difficulty of maintaining a classic car, it would seem). For business, cost considerations can favor 3D printing over plastic injection molding for small runs – currently about 1000 units or less. One company even lets you print your World of Warcraft character as a 3D Plastic model, because it’s so easy to adapt the same machine to many different designs.

Coming to a desk near you? ...but maybe we should let Apple pretty up the case first.

 

The mind quickens with possibilities: as technology improves, more materials can be printed, and the costs come down, what could we do? I feel like fantasizing a little this week. What might happen when the technology is really, fully developed, perhaps in a few decades from now?

Continue reading

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share
Posted in Fun Stuff, Mechanical Engineering | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Intergraph SmartPlant P&ID User Tips and Tricks for Speed

Intergraph’s SmartPlant P&ID (SPPID), is part of their data-base driven SmartPlant package. It uses a drafting interface, like AutoCAD, but with some big differences. SPPID is both much more powerful than AutoCAD, and much less suited to quickly creating drawings.

Why? SPPID lets you use the P&IDs to populate the underlying SmartPlant project database. The idea is that you can use this database to get reports (like line lists, valve lists, etc.) and also link to other programs (like your SmartPlant 3-D plant layout). Therefore, in creating your P&ID, you’re also creating multiple documents that rely on and flow from it. All these documents will rely on the same database and therefore always be in agreement.

The program takes a while to master, and the database aspect makes the program slower because everything you do has to be communicated back to the database. Investing the extra time to create that database does payoff big down the road, but time is always at a premium and we still want to get our drawings out faster. Here are a few tips and tricks I’ve picked up along the way. I’m going to write assuming you know the program already or have at least taken a course with it, and want to swap some tricks.

Toolbars

In the symbol catalog explorer, you have the option to create your own personal toolbars of symbols. Use it, abuse it, it is definitely well worth the time and screen real-estate it takes to make a good toolbar. You can place/anchor/dock the toolbars to any edge of your screen. You can make several toolbars, and make sub-divisions within the toolbars, and I suggest you make several smaller toolbars grouped by theme. Keep all your commonly used symbols handy and only browse symbols for the rare items. Be careful of making toolbars so large they fall off the screen, however.

As a suggestion, here are some things I have on my toolbar: Continue reading

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share
Posted in Database-Driven Design, Drawings and Diagrams | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Back in business

The website is back to normal and the “generic money-making link site” harpy is banished. I’ll have some lengthy articles later this month. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share
Posted in Blog / Website News | Leave a comment

Process Flow Diagram Checklist

This short checklist will help you when drawings a Process Flow Diagram and the associated heat and material balance (aka stream table). This is a sister article to my Process and Instrumentation Diagram Checklist.

Items to check:

  • Page number
  • Revision number and revision purpose
  • Sign-off information (such a drafter/designer/checker/approver) is correct
  • All dates
  • Drawing Title-block
  • Notes/holds are there and correct. Check spelling, placement. Ensure any project-wide notes and holds are present.
  • Stream Table – latest data, correct units of measurement, all necessary streams are listed
  • Stream Table – quick logical spot-check:  vapor lines don’t have liquid flowrates or vice-versa, low pressures do not flow into high pressures, mass balance closes, two sides of an exchanger have the same change in enthalpy Continue reading
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share
Posted in Drawings and Diagrams | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Beginners guide to picking a pump

This is one of the better beginner’s articles on understanding pump curves and picking a correct pump for your application: “Understand the Fundamentals of Centrifugal Pumps.” Some of the important terms unique to picking pumps are explained.

If you’re already experienced at this, you can skip this article.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share
Posted in Pumps/Piping/Hydraulics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment